Neil v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Neil v. Oregon State Penitentiary

758 P.2d 893, 92 Or. App. 577

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 17, 1988

Docket07-87-387; CA A46012

StatusPublished

This text of 758 P.2d 893 (Neil v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neil v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 758 P.2d 893, 92 Or. App. 577 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of violating an institution disciplinary rule and required him to serve three months in segregation and pay a $100 fine. He first contends that there was not substantial evidence to sustain the finding of guilty. There was. He also argues that imposition of the fine is not authorized. He is correct. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of violating an institution disciplinary rule and required him to serve three months in segregation and pay a $100 fine. He first contends that there was not substantial evidence to sustain the finding of guilty. There was. He also argues that imposition of the fine is not authorized. He is correct. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 P.2d 893, 92 Or. App. 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neil-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack