Neil v. . New Bern

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Neil v. . New Bern

5 N.C. 133

DecidedJune 5, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.C. 133 (Neil v. . New Bern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neil v. . New Bern, 5 N.C. 133 (N.C. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

From Edenton. The question in this case referred to this Court was whether an executor or administrator can assign the securities of his testator or intestate, without naming himself executor or administrator. Elizabeth Raimeke, executrix of the last will of her deceased husband, assigned the bond on which the suit was brought, to Neil, the plaintiff, without adding to her name the word executrix. On the trial the plaintiff proved the execution of the bond and gave in evidence the will of Raimeke, the testator, and a certificate of the qualification of the executrix, and also proved the assignment. (134) Let the rule for a new trial be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

From Edenton. The question in this case referred to this Court was whether an executor or administrator can assign the securities of his testator or intestate, without naming himself executor or administrator. Elizabeth Raimeke, executrix of the last will of her deceased husband, assigned the bond on which the suit was brought, to Neil, the plaintiff, without adding to her name the word executrix. On the trial the plaintiff proved the execution of the bond and gave in evidence the will of Raimeke, the testator, and a certificate of the qualification of the executrix, and also proved the assignment. (134) Let the rule for a new trial be discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 N.C. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neil-v-new-bern-nc-1806.