Neil v. Ellis
287 So. 2d 739, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6229
Opinions
ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
This matter is before the court on separate motions to dismiss of appellees, Carien Realty Company and A. L. Ellis and Helen L. Ellis.
The pertinent part of the trial court’s order is:
Amended Counterclaim of Marjorie R. Neil be and the same is hereby granted without leave to Defendant, Neil to amend.
2. Defendant, Carien Realty Company’s Motion to Dismiss Crossclaim of Marjorie R. Neil be and the same is hereby granted without leave to Defendant, Neil to amend.
The sole question for our determination is whether the order entered by the able trial judge is a final order susceptible to appeal.
The record before the court is insufficient to support the motions to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, they are
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neil v. Ellis, 287 So. 2d 739, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6229 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).
287 So. 2d 739 (Neil v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taussig v. Ins. Co. of North America
301 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Ellis v. Neil
286 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)