Neil v. Bank

50 Ohio St. (N.S.) 193
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 1893·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

At common law a judgment did not bear interest. Freeman on Judgments, § 441. Interest is an incident added by statute. It is given in this state by §§ 3180, 3181, Revised Statutes. By section 3180 judgments rendered on instruments reserving interest at a rate not exceeding eight per cent, per annum, bear interest at the rate stipulated in the instrument; in all other cases the judgment bears interest at the rate of six per cent., § 3181, Revised Statutes. Hence, a judgment rendered in this state upon a note executed in another state bearing interest at a rate, valid by the laws of the state where executed, bul greater than allowed by the laws of this state, bears interest at the rate of 6 per cent. only.

Judgment modified accordingly.

Dickman, J., did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neil v. Bank, 50 Ohio St. (N.S.) 193 (Ohio 1893).

50 Ohio St. (N.S.) 193 (Neil v. Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.