Neil Noble v. State
This text of Neil Noble v. State (Neil Noble v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 2, 2013
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00591-CR
NEIL NOBLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F06-86575
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Neil Noble filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court asking that the trial
court order the Dallas County District Attorney to review appellant’s motion to vacate his plea.
The trial court did not rule on the petition for writ of mandamus and appellant filed a notice of
appeal from the trial court’s “decision.” We conclude we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.
“Jurisdiction concerns the power of a court to hear and determine a case.” Olivo v. State,
918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The jurisdiction of an appellate court must be
legally invoked, and, if not, the power of the court to act is as absent as if it did not exist. See id.
at 523. As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only
after conviction. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.––Dallas 1998, no pet.). A
court of appeals has no jurisdiction over an appeal absent a written judgment or an appealable order. See Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Nikrasch v. State,
698 S.W.2d 443, 450 (Tex. App.––Dallas 1985, no pet.).
In this case, the trial court did not rule on appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus.
Therefore, there is neither a judgment nor an appealable order, leaving us without jurisdiction.
See Gutierrez, 307 S.W.3d at 321; Nikrasch, 698 S.W.2d at 450.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 130591F.U05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
NEIL NOBLE, Appellant On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-13-00591-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F06-86575. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Evans participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered July 2, 2013
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Neil Noble v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neil-noble-v-state-texapp-2013.