Neihart v. Roseburg Lumber Co.

752 P.2d 353, 90 Or. App. 432
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 13, 1988
DocketWCB 85-13216; CA A42468
StatusPublished

This text of 752 P.2d 353 (Neihart v. Roseburg Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neihart v. Roseburg Lumber Co., 752 P.2d 353, 90 Or. App. 432 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that reversed the referee and reinstated the insurer’s denial of compensability of certain proposed surgical procedures. After the Board issued its order, the surgical procedures were performed. We allowed the record to be supplemented by new evidence relating to the surgeries and claimant’s post-operative condition. Because the new evidence could affect the issue of whether the surgical procedures are compensable under ORS 656.245, we reverse and remand to the referee for consideration of the new evidence. Cain v. Woolley Enterprises, 83 Or App 213, 730 P2d 1274 (1986).

Reversed and remanded to the referee for consideration of new evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cain v. Woolley Enterprises
730 P.2d 1274 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
752 P.2d 353, 90 Or. App. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neihart-v-roseburg-lumber-co-orctapp-1988.