Neighborhood Development Collaborative v. Ginsberg

102 F. App'x 811
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 2004
DocketNos. 03-2412, 04-1060
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 102 F. App'x 811 (Neighborhood Development Collaborative v. Ginsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neighborhood Development Collaborative v. Ginsberg, 102 F. App'x 811 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In Appeal No. 03-2412, Morton L. Ginsberg appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and granting summary judgment in favor of Neighborhood Development Collaborative (“NDC”) in NDC’s declaratory judgment action. Ginsberg also appeals the court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. [812]*812R.Civ.P. 59(e). In Appeal No. 04-1060, Ginsberg’s attorney, David F. Albright, appeals the district court’s order imposing sanctions against him in the form of a reprimand. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Neighborhood Dev. Collaborative v. Ginsberg, No. CA-03-1552-1-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2003; Oct. 7, 2003; Nov. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ginsberg v. Neighborhood Development Collaborative
543 U.S. 1052 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 F. App'x 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neighborhood-development-collaborative-v-ginsberg-ca4-2004.