Neighborcare Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Cathedral Rock of St. Charles, Inc.

380 S.W.3d 616, 2012 WL 4328091, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1161
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2012·No. No. ED 98082·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cathedral Rock of St. Charles, Inc., Cathedral Rock of North St. Louis, Inc., Cathedral Rock of Florissant, Inc., Cathedral Rock of Rolla, Inc., and Cathedral Rock of Ballwin, Inc. (collectively “Cathedral Rock”) appeal the denial of their motion to set aside the consent judgment entered in favor of Neighborcare Pharmacy Services, [617] Inc. (“Neighborcare”)-1 We find that the trial court did not err in denying Cathedral Rock’s motion to set aside the consent judgment.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neighborcare Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Cathedral Rock of St. Charles, Inc., 380 S.W.3d 616, 2012 WL 4328091, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1161 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

380 S.W.3d 616 (Neighborcare Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Cathedral Rock of St. Charles, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.