Neidich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
105 F.2d 1019, 23 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 303, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3471
Opinion
This case arises out of the same corporate transactions which were before the Court of Claims in Davis v. United States, 26 F.Supp. 1007. It is indistinguishable in principle from Groman v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 82, 58 S.Ct. 108, 82 L.Ed. 63, Helvering v. Bashford, 302 U.S. 454, 58 S.Ct. 307, 82 L.Ed. 367, and Hedden v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 105 F.2d 311. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed upon the authority of those cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neidich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 105 F.2d 1019, 23 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 303, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3471 (3d Cir. 1939).
105 F.2d 1019 (Neidich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Groman v. Commissioner
302 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Helvering v. Bashford
302 U.S. 454 (Supreme Court, 1938)
Hedden v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
105 F.2d 311 (Third Circuit, 1939)
Davis v. United States
26 F. Supp. 1007 (Court of Claims, 1939)