Nehmzow v. Deschutes County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Nehmzow v. Deschutes County

479 P.3d 340, 308 Or. App. 533

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 13, 2021·No. A174517·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Argued and submitted October 19, 2020, affirmed January 13, 2021

Tommy NEHMZOW, Respondent, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, Keith Adams, and Kristin Adams, Petitioners. Land Use Board of Appeals 2019110; A174517 479 P3d 340

D. Adam Smith argued the cause for petitioners. Also on the joint brief were Amy Heverly, Elizabeth A. Dickson and Dickson Hatfield LLP. Michael R. Hughes argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Waveseer of Oregon, LLC v. Deschutes County, 308 Or App 494, 482 P3d 212 (2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Argued and submitted October 19, 2020, affirmed January 13, 2021

Tommy NEHMZOW, Respondent, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, Keith Adams, and Kristin Adams, Petitioners. Land Use Board of Appeals 2019110; A174517 479 P3d 340

D. Adam Smith argued the cause for petitioners. Also on the joint brief were Amy Heverly, Elizabeth A. Dickson and Dickson Hatfield LLP. Michael R. Hughes argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Waveseer of Oregon, LLC v. Deschutes County, 308 Or App 494, 482 P3d 212 (2021).

Nehmzow v. Deschutes County, 479 P.3d 340, 308 Or. App. 533 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

479 P.3d 340 (Nehmzow v. Deschutes County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related