Nehe, Inc. v. Liflans Corp.

569 So. 2d 839, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8455, 1990 WL 169472
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 1990
DocketNo. 90-756
StatusPublished

This text of 569 So. 2d 839 (Nehe, Inc. v. Liflans Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nehe, Inc. v. Liflans Corp., 569 So. 2d 839, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8455, 1990 WL 169472 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nehe, Inc. and Master Travel Planners, Inc. appeal an adverse summary final judgment. The developer of a hotel condominium, appellee Liflans Corp., was required by the declaration of condominium to convey the building’s commercial space to the appellee condominium association at the time that the last residential hotel unit was sold. The developer had leased the space to appellant Nehe, Inc. for a term of ten years, but the last residential unit was sold prior to the expiration of the lease. We agree with the trial court that the developer could not convey a greater estate than it had. See Chapman v. Chapman, 526 So.2d 131, 134-35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The leasehold thus terminated upon conveyance of the commercial units to the condominium association. Absent joinder in the lease by the association (after turnover of control to the unit owners) or other appropriate authorization in the declaration of condominium, the developer could not burden the association’s interest.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chapman v. Chapman
526 So. 2d 131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 So. 2d 839, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8455, 1990 WL 169472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nehe-inc-v-liflans-corp-fladistctapp-1990.