Negusie v. Gonzales

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Negusie v. Gonzales. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 F. App'x 325
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2009·No. 06-60193·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED April 13, 2009 No. 06-60193 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

DANIEL GIRMAI NEGUSIE,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States (A15 575 924)

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In Negusie v. Holder, 555 U.S. ___ (2009), the Supreme Court of the United States reversed our judgment in this case, which affirmed the judgment of the Board of Immigration Appeals. The Court remanded with instructions for the Board to interpret the relevant statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42), consistent with its opinion. The judgment of the Board is therefore VACATED, and the case is remanded to it for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion. VACATED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Negusie v. Gonzales, (5th Cir. 2009).

Negusie v. Gonzales (Negusie v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Definitions
8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)