Negron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Negron v. State

567 So. 2d 1069, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7933, 1990 WL 154808

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Negron v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 287 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1990·No. No. 89-2018·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jose Antonio Negron, appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion, followed an evi-dentiary hearing in which appellant raised ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the trial court’s order based upon a holding that appellant failed to establish that his counsel’s allegedly deficient performance prejudiced appellant’s case. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Downs v. State, 453 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jose Antonio Negron, appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion, followed an evi-dentiary hearing in which appellant raised ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the trial court’s order based upon a holding that appellant failed to establish that his counsel’s allegedly deficient performance prejudiced appellant’s case. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Downs v. State, 453 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1984).

Affirmed.

Negron v. State, 567 So. 2d 1069, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7933, 1990 WL 154808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

567 So. 2d 1069 (Negron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related