Negron v. Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Negron v. Kaufman

26 A.D.2d 548, 271 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4055

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 548 (Negron v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Negron v. Kaufman, 26 A.D.2d 548, 271 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and breach of contract, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 29, 1965 which, on defendant’s motion, (1) directed plaintiff to submit to a physical examination, (2) stayed the trial and all further proceedings pending completion of such examination and (3) directed dismissal of the complaint in the event of plaintiff’s failure to comply with the order. Order reversed and motion denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. Under the Special Rules of this court (part 7, rules III, VII) defendants are deemed to have waived their right to the examination sought (Juett v. Paesani, 19 A D 2d 726; Byrnes v. Dan’s Taxi, 18 A D 2d 807). No “ unusual or unanticipated conditions ” within the meaning of rule VII were shown to permit departure from the general rule. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and breach of contract, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 29, 1965 which, on defendant’s motion, (1) directed plaintiff to submit to a physical examination, (2) stayed the trial and all further proceedings pending completion of such examination and (3) directed dismissal of the complaint in the event of plaintiff’s failure to comply with the order. Order reversed and motion denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. Under the Special Rules of this court (part 7, rules III, VII) defendants are deemed to have waived their right to the examination sought (Juett v. Paesani, 19 A D 2d 726; Byrnes v. Dan’s Taxi, 18 A D 2d 807). No “ unusual or unanticipated conditions ” within the meaning of rule VII were shown to permit departure from the general rule. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 548, 271 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/negron-v-kaufman-nyappdiv-1966.