Negro William Richardson's Case

20 F. Cas. 703, 5 D.C. 338, 5 Cranch 338
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1837
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 F. Cas. 703 (Negro William Richardson's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Negro William Richardson's Case, 20 F. Cas. 703, 5 D.C. 338, 5 Cranch 338 (circtddc 1837).

Opinion

Cranch, C. J.,

was also of opinion that the commitment was not sufficient, as it did not state any conviction by the justice, or even an opinion that the prisoner was a runaway; but a mere assertion that he was charged as a runaway; and said that the magistrate is bound to examine the case, and be satisfied by competent evidence on oath that the person is a runaway.

He gave no opinion upon the question whether the Maryland laws upon this subject were applicable to this county.

The CouRT (Thruston, J., absent,) ordered the prisoner to be discharged, because the warrant of commitment was insufficient, and because they were satisfied that he was not a runaway.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam
591 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 703, 5 D.C. 338, 5 Cranch 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/negro-william-richardsons-case-circtddc-1837.