Negreen v. Stokes

123 Misc. 929, 206 N.Y.S. 608, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1230
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 Misc. 929 (Negreen v. Stokes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Negreen v. Stokes, 123 Misc. 929, 206 N.Y.S. 608, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the entry of the order of this court reversing the order of the court below opening the defendant’s default and reinstating the judgments, the court below was without power to reopen the default, the Appellate Term not having given leave to renew. Moreover no fact was shown on the renewed motion that was not either shown or well known to the defendant when the first motion was made. Goldenberg v. Adler, 123 N. Y. Supp. 387; American Dry Plate Co. v. N. Y. Ferrotype Co., 200 id. 115; Kirkpatrick Home for Childless Women v. Kenyon, 209 App, Div. 179.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, motion denied, and judgments reinstated.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Burrows
218 A.D. 190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 Misc. 929, 206 N.Y.S. 608, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/negreen-v-stokes-nyappterm-1924.