Neglea v. G. A. Zimmerman Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neglea v. G. A. Zimmerman Corp.

206 A.D. 634

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The claimant has lost one foot and has lost the use oi the other foot. The loss of the use of a member is the equivalent to the loss of the member. He is entitled, therefore, to the compensation as tor a permanent total disability, to wit, two-thirds of his average weekly wage. Subdivision 5 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The claimant has lost one foot and has lost the use oi the other foot. The loss of the use of a member is the equivalent to the loss of the member. He is entitled, therefore, to the compensation as tor a permanent total disability, to wit, two-thirds of his average weekly wage. Subdivision 5 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law

Neglea v. G. A. Zimmerman Corp., 206 A.D. 634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

206 A.D. 634 (Neglea v. G. A. Zimmerman Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related