NEFTALI DEJESUS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of NEFTALI DEJESUS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (NEFTALI DEJESUS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 22, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-1913 Lower Tribunal No. F10-23279 ________________
Neftali DeJesus, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.
Neftali DeJesus, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Petion v. State, 48 So. 3d 726, 730 (Fla. 2010)
(acknowledging that in a nonjury case there is a rebuttable presumption that
the trial court based its decision upon admissible evidence and disregarded
any inadmissible evidence; “if a trial judge receives evidence as the finder of
fact and hears inadmissible evidence, such as through a suppression
hearing, a proffer, a motion in limine, or prior to sustaining an objection to
the evidence, the judge is generally presumed to have disregarded the
improper evidence. Therefore, any error in the trial judge's exposure to this
improper evidence is deemed harmless”; further, where the trial court, sitting
as factfinder, makes an express statement on the record that erroneously
admitted evidence was not considered or did not contribute to the court’s
decision, any error in the admission of that evidence will ordinarily be
presumed harmless, in the absence of a showing that the trial court actually
relied upon the erroneous evidence in reaching its determination); King v.
State, 988 So. 2d 111, 113 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (noting that “in a bench trial,
there is a presumption that the trial court disregards any erroneously
admitted evidence” and further noting that the trial court “specifically stated
that it was not considering testimony other than that directly related to the
murder”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
NEFTALI DEJESUS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neftali-dejesus-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.