Neff v. Neff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neff v. Neff

232 A.D. 863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 863 (Neff v. Neff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neff v. Neff, 232 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice; this court holding that the provision contained in the order, requiring any later motion to be made before the same justice, is improper. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Hinman, J., who vote that the part of the order reducing the alimony should be affirmed, without prejudice to later application for modification of the amount of alimony at any Special Term and not before any particular justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice; this court holding that the provision contained in the order, requiring any later motion to be made before the same justice, is improper. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Hinman, J., who vote that the part of the order reducing the alimony should be affirmed, without prejudice to later application for modification of the amount of alimony at any Special Term and not before any particular justice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neff-v-neff-nyappdiv-1931.