Neev v. Alcon Lensx, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Neev v. Alcon Lensx, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 2016

Docket15-1422

StatusUnpublished

This text of Neev v. Alcon Lensx, Inc. (Neev v. Alcon Lensx, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neev v. Alcon Lensx, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JOSEPH NEEV, Petitioner-Appellant

v.

ALCON LENSX, INC., Respondent-Appellee ______________________

2015-1422, 2015-1821 ______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:14-cv-00660-GHK- JEM, Judge George H. King. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DAVID ALAN MAKMAN, Law Offices of David A. Mak- man, San Mateo, CA, argued for petitioner-appellant.

BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by ERIC MARTIN ACKER, MARY PRENDERGAST, San Diego, CA. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 11, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI