Neese v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Neese v. State

77 So. 1004, 16 Ala. App. 696

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 12, 1918

Docket4 Div. 545.

StatusPublished

This text of 77 So. 1004 (Neese v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neese v. State, 77 So. 1004, 16 Ala. App. 696 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the second degree, and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is taken. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has expired. The appeal is upon the record proper, from which it appears that the proceedings in the court below were regular and free from error. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the second degree, and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is taken. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has expired. The appeal is upon the record proper, from which it appears that the proceedings in the court below were regular and free from error. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 So. 1004, 16 Ala. App. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neese-v-state-alactapp-1918.