Neese v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Neese v. State

77 So. 1004, 16 Ala. App. 696

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 12, 1918·No. 4 Div. 545.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the second degree, and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is taken. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has expired. The appeal is upon the record proper, from which it appears that the proceedings in the court below were regular and free from error. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the second degree, and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is taken. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has expired. The appeal is upon the record proper, from which it appears that the proceedings in the court below were regular and free from error. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Neese v. State, 77 So. 1004, 16 Ala. App. 696 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

77 So. 1004 (Neese v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.