Neely v. United States

151 F.2d 533
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 30, 1945·No. No. 11369·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The conditions of probation included one that the probationer should not violate any law, local, State or national. On a motion to revoke the probation the evidence of the officers made a case, by circumstances, showing one or more violations of the liquor laws. The probationer, supported by his wife, denied the truth of this evidence. The issue was for the decision of the judge, who believed the officers. No error appears. Roberts v. United States, 320 U.S. 264, 64 S.Ct. 113, 88 L.Ed. 41; Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 53 S.Ct. 154, 77 L.Ed. 266.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neely v. United States, 151 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1945).

151 F.2d 533 (Neely v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Charles Markovich, Jr.
348 F.2d 238 (Second Circuit, 1965)