Neely v. State
497 P.2d 898, 88 Nev. 332, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 463
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant contends that, for various reasons, the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce at trial certain testimony previously given at appellant’s preliminary hearing. Whatever the merits of such contentions might be if appellant’s counsel had made a timely objection, stating specific grounds, these issues have not been properly preserved for our review. Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 488 P.2d 1161 (1971); Kelley v. State, 76 Nev. 65, 348 P.2d 966 (1960); NRS 47.040(1)(a).
Other assignments of error are without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neely v. State, 497 P.2d 898, 88 Nev. 332, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 463 (Neb. 1972).
497 P.2d 898 (Neely v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kelley v. State
348 P.2d 966 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1960)
Merica v. State
488 P.2d 1161 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1971)