Neely v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Neely v. State

497 P.2d 898, 88 Nev. 332, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 463

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 1972

DocketNo. 6318

StatusPublished

This text of 497 P.2d 898 (Neely v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neely v. State, 497 P.2d 898, 88 Nev. 332, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 463 (Neb. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends that, for various reasons, the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce at trial certain testimony previously given at appellant’s preliminary hearing. Whatever the merits of such contentions might be if appellant’s counsel had made a timely objection, stating specific grounds, these issues have not been properly preserved for our review. Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 488 P.2d 1161 (1971); Kelley v. State, 76 Nev. 65, 348 P.2d 966 (1960); NRS 47.040(1)(a).

Other assignments of error are without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI