Neely v. State

557 So. 2d 122, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 792, 1990 WL 11783
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1990
DocketNo. 88-1657
StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 122 (Neely v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neely v. State, 557 So. 2d 122, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 792, 1990 WL 11783 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

From the outset of the trial the defense brought forward the defendant’s explanation for his presence in the hotel at the time of the robbery. That distinguishes the present case from Bayshore v. State, 437 So.2d 198 (Fla.3d DCA 1983). The prosecutor’s remark in closing was fair comment upon the opening statement by the defense. See id. at 199.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bayshore v. State
437 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 So. 2d 122, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 792, 1990 WL 11783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neely-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.