Neely v. Henkel (No. 2)
180 U.S. 126, 21 S. Ct. 308, 45 L. Ed. 457, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1289
Opinion
NEELY
v.
HENKEL (No. 2).
Supreme Court of United States.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.
The record in this case, it is admitted, shows the same state of facts as in the case just decided. This was a second application for a writ of habeas corpus, upon substantially the same grounds as were urged in the other case. The additional allegations in this application for the writ did not materially change the situation.
For the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered, the judgment of the Circuit Court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neely v. Henkel (No. 2), 180 U.S. 126, 21 S. Ct. 308, 45 L. Ed. 457, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1289 (1901).
180 U.S. 126 (Neely v. Henkel (No. 2)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Skaftouros v. United States
667 F.3d 144 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Senator Barry Goldwater v. James Earl Carter, President of the United States
617 F.2d 697 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Galanis
429 F. Supp. 1215 (D. Connecticut, 1977)
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rubber Tire Wheel Co.
164 F. 869 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1908)