Home/Supreme Court/Neely v. Henkel (No. 2)

Neely v. Henkel (No. 2)

180 U.S. 126, 21 S. Ct. 308, 45 L. Ed. 457, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1289
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 14, 1901
Docket406
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 180 U.S. 126 (Neely v. Henkel (No. 2)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neely v. Henkel (No. 2), 180 U.S. 126, 21 S. Ct. 308, 45 L. Ed. 457, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1289 (1901).

Opinion

180 U.S. 126 (1901)

NEELY
v.
HENKEL (No. 2).

No. 406.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 10, 11, 1900.
Decided January 14, 1901.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case, it is admitted, shows the same state of facts as in the case just decided. This was a second application for a writ of habeas corpus, upon substantially the same grounds as were urged in the other case. The additional allegations in this application for the writ did not materially change the situation.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered, the judgment of the Circuit Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skaftouros v. United States
667 F.3d 144 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Senator Barry Goldwater v. James Earl Carter, President of the United States
617 F.2d 697 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Galanis
429 F. Supp. 1215 (D. Connecticut, 1977)
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rubber Tire Wheel Co.
164 F. 869 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 U.S. 126, 21 S. Ct. 308, 45 L. Ed. 457, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neely-v-henkel-no-2-scotus-1901.