Neely v. Entrekin
This text of Neely v. Entrekin (Neely v. Entrekin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-1209 _____________________________
MARTIN T. NEELY, Former Husband,
Appellant,
v.
LINDSAY J. ENTREKIN, Former Wife,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. William F. Stone and John T. Brown, Judges.
May 13, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See King v. King, 363 So. 3d 1099, 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023) (Holding that “a judgment need not be reversed solely because a trial court adopts a proposed order verbatim.” Instead, there are various factors to be considered by an appellate court in determining whether a judgment reflects a trial judge’s independent decision-making).
BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Michael T. Webster of Michael T. Webster, P.A., Shalimar, for Appellant.
Andrew D. Wheeler of The Wheeler Firm, PA, Niceville, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Neely v. Entrekin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neely-v-entrekin-fladistctapp-2026.