Neeley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Neeley v. State

1911 OK CR 157, 115 P. 1131, 5 Okla. Crim. 669, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 239

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 6, 1911

DocketNo. A-212.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 157 (Neeley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neeley v. State, 1911 OK CR 157, 115 P. 1131, 5 Okla. Crim. 669, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 239 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted for a violation of the prohibition liquor law and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ imprisonment in jail. The officers who arrested appellant found a bottle of whisky about one-half full on the person of the appellant. Appellant told the officers that he brought the whisky with him from Bokchito, which was some five or six miles from the place where the arrest was made. According to appellant’s own admission he was guilty of violating the prohibition law. The other evidence in the case becomes immaterial in view of defendant’s admission. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted for a violation of the prohibition liquor law and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ imprisonment in jail. The officers who arrested appellant found a bottle of whisky about one-half full on the person of the appellant. Appellant told the officers that he brought the whisky with him from Bokchito, which was some five or six miles from the place where the arrest was made. According to appellant’s own admission he was guilty of violating the prohibition law. The other evidence in the case becomes immaterial in view of defendant’s admission. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 157, 115 P. 1131, 5 Okla. Crim. 669, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neeley-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.