Neeley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Neeley v. State

280 S.W.3d 737, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2009 WL 436646

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 24, 2009

DocketWD 69639

StatusPublished

This text of 280 S.W.3d 737 (Neeley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neeley v. State, 280 S.W.3d 737, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2009 WL 436646 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Larry Neeley appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. On appeal, Neeley argues that he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel because counsel raised, in an amended Rule 29.15 motion, only one of the nine issues Neeley raised in his pro se motion. The substance of Neeley’s claim does not address any of the recognized situations implicating the narrow abandonment exception to the Rule 75.01 time limit on the circuit court’s jurisdiction.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Larry Neeley appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. On appeal, Neeley argues that he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel because counsel raised, in an amended Rule 29.15 motion, only one of the nine issues Neeley raised in his pro se motion. The substance of Neeley’s claim does not address any of the recognized situations implicating the narrow abandonment exception to the Rule 75.01 time limit on the circuit court’s jurisdiction.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 S.W.3d 737, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2009 WL 436646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neeley-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack