Neeley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
This text of Neeley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Neeley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 19, 2017
* * * * * * * * * * * * * ELIZABETH NEELEY, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 16-251V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Joint Stipulation; Haemophilus AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Influenzae Type B (“Hib”), * Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, and Respondent. * Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular * Pertussis (“TDaP”) Vaccinations; * * * * * * * * * * * * * Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”).
Michael G. McLaren, Black McLaren, et al., PC, Memphis, TN, for petitioner. Amy P. Kokot, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
On February 23, 2016, Elizabeth Neeley (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (2012).2 Petitioner received the haemophilus influenzae type B (“Hib”), hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“TDaP”) vaccinations on or about February 20, 2015. Petitioner alleges that these vaccinations caused her to develop Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) and/ or other neurological and physical impairments, with residual effects lasting for more than six months.
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012). The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the decision is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the decision will be posted on the court’s website. Id.
2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. On July 18, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should be entered awarded compensation to petitioner. Joint Stipulation (ECF No. 38). Respondent denies that the aforementioned vaccines are the cause of petitioner’s alleged GBS and/ or any other injury or her current condition. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following in compensation:
1) A lump sum of $132,656.35, which amount represents compensation for first- year life care expenses ($12,656.35) and pain and suffering and past unreimbursable expenses ($120,000.00) in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Elizabeth Neeley.
2) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of the stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).
Joint Stipulation at ¶ 8. These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. IN TlI.E UNlTED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
) BLIZABETH NE:ELEY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 16-25 t V (ECF) v. ) Speciai Master Gowen ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. } ~~~~~~---'-'--~~~~~~)
SIJ.P!JLATION The parties hereby stipulate to the followi11g matters:
I. Elizaberh Neeley, petitioner, filed a petitio11 for vaccine com1Jcnsation 11.ndcr the
Nat.ional Vaccine injury Compensation Program, 4/. U.S .C. §§ 30-0aa- IOto ~34 (lhe ''Vaccine
Program"). The petition seeks colllpensmion fer injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt
of the Hacmophilus jnflucnz.ac type b ("Hib.'), hepatilis A, hepatitis B, anti/or tctnnus-diphtheria-
.ncellular pertussis {''Td~p'") vaccines, which vaccines are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table
(the ·'Table"), 42 C.f.R. § !00.3(a).
2. Petitioner received I-lib, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and Tdop vaccinati0ns on or about
February 20, 20 15. 1
3. The vaccines were a 4. Petitioner alleges that Ule Hib, hcpaticis A, hepatitis B, ahd/or Tdap vaccines caused her to develop Gui llain-Barr~ Syndrome ("GBS,,) and/or other neurological and physical Petitioner :ilso received the Pncumovax v.accin~, which is not covc:red under the Progrnm . imptti1m~nts_ Petitioner further alleges thnt she experienced the l'CSiduiil effects ()f these injuries for more than si1o; monlhs. S. Petitioner represel1ts that there has been no pri(lr award or settlement of n civil action for damages as a result of her condition. 6. Respondent denies that tile Hib, hepatitis A. hepatitii: A, andfor Tdap vaccines a otlm· injury or her cun:ent condition. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions 1 the pm1lcs nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should b: entered awarding the compensation described in paragrnph 8 of this Stipulation. 8. As soon as practic.able aft.er :t1i entry <>f judgme1ll reflec ting a decision consistent with lhe terrns of tbis StipuJalion, and after pctitior\er has filed an election to receive compcllSalim1 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300:aa-2 l (a)( I). the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccl11c compen saLion payments: a. A lump sum of$ I 32,656.35, which amount represents coinpcnsaiion for first-yeaJ' life-care expenses ($12.,656.35) and pain and suffering and past unreimbursable expenses ($120,000.00) in the form ofo check payable to petitioner~ and l>. An amount sufficient to purchase the a1111uity contract dcscrihed in paragraph I 0 below, paid to the life insurnncc company from which the nnnuily will be ptuchased (the ''Ute Insurance Company''). 9.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Neeley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neeley-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2017.