Neeley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

199 Ill. App. 90
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 17, 1916·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Witnesses, § 33*—when wife incompetent witness for husband. In an action on a life insurance policy by a husband as beneficiary, the wife of plaintiff is an incompetent witness in his behalf under Rev. St., ch. 51, sec. 5 (J. & A. U 5522.) 3. Instructions, § 151*—when instruction covered by given instructions properly refused. An instruction is properly refused where it is covered by given instructions. 4. Instructions, § 96*—when instruction on credibility of witness proper. In an action on a life insurance policy against a corporation, an instruction that if the jury believed from the evidence that plaintiff had wilfully sworn falsely as to any material matter on the trial then they might disregard his entire testimony, held improperly refused, since, one of the parties being a natural person, it was proper to direct the attention of the jury to his testimony and not draft the instruction so as to apply to both parties, as should be done where both parties were natural persons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neeley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 199 Ill. App. 90 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

199 Ill. App. 90 (Neeley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.