Needlers British Imports v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Needlers British Imports v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 397

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 18, 1956

DocketNo. 60290; protest 224960-K (Denver)

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 397 (Needlers British Imports v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Needlers British Imports v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 397 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

At the trial, a representative of the plaintiff made an unsworn statement, introduced a sample of the knives, which was received in evidence as exhibit 1, and requested that the protest serve the dual purpose of protest and brief. From an examination of the protest, it was apparent that the plaintiff recognized the applicability of paragraph 355, as modified, supra, to its importation, but sought the benefit of a lower rate of duty thereon, i. e., 2 cents each plus 12)4 percent ad valorem, contending that the knives are all-purpose knives rather than being limited to bread cutting. While the protest indicated that “Owing to the fact that our costings has bee.n based on the lower rate, any increase in duties would entail hardship and some loss,” the record did not afford sufficient evidence to justify the court in disturbing the action of the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

At the trial, a representative of the plaintiff made an unsworn statement, introduced a sample of the knives, which was received in evidence as exhibit 1, and requested that the protest serve the dual purpose of protest and brief. From an examination of the protest, it was apparent that the plaintiff recognized the applicability of paragraph 355, as modified, supra, to its importation, but sought the benefit of a lower rate of duty thereon, i. e., 2 cents each plus 12)4 percent ad valorem, contending that the knives are all-purpose knives rather than being limited to bread cutting. While the protest indicated that “Owing to the fact that our costings has bee.n based on the lower rate, any increase in duties would entail hardship and some loss,” the record did not afford sufficient evidence to justify the court in disturbing the action of the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Cust. Ct. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/needlers-british-imports-v-united-states-cusc-1956.