Needleman v. Voorhis

173 N.E. 6, 254 N.Y. 339, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 1044
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 7, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A borough president is an elective officer and a member of the board of aldermen (Greater New York Charter, § 18). That body is charged under the Constitution (Art. Ill, § 5) with the duty of dividing the several counties within the city of New York into Assembly districts and its members are constitutional officers (People ex rel. Deitz v. Hogan, 214 N. Y. 216, 222; Matter of Schwab v. Boyle, 174 App. Div. 442, 445; affd., 219 N. Y. 561). The present incumbent of the office of *341 borough president of the borough of Brooklyn, appointed to fill a vacancy (Greater New York Charter, § 382), is forbidden to hold his office by virtue of such appointment beyond the commencement of the next political year (Const, art. X, § 5). So much of section 382 of the Greater New York Charter as provides that a vacancy in this office shall be filled for the unexpired term of his predecessor is, therefore, unconstitutional.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Needleman v. Voorhis, 173 N.E. 6, 254 N.Y. 339, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 1044 (N.Y. 1930).

173 N.E. 6 (Needleman v. Voorhis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bergerman v. Gerosa
2 A.D.2d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Johnson v. City of New York
9 N.E.2d 30 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
McEneny v. McKee
236 A.D. 140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)