Neducsin, D. v. Caplan, S.
This text of Neducsin, D. v. Caplan, S. (Neducsin, D. v. Caplan, S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
DANIEL R. NEDUCSIN, : No. 503 EAL 2015 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : SCOTT CAPLAN, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this
matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Neducsin, D. v. Caplan, S., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neducsin-d-v-caplan-s-pa-2016.