Ned v. Union Pacific Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Ned v. Union Pacific Corp.

61 So. 3d 664, 2011 La. LEXIS 741, 2011 WL 1619772

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 25, 2011·No. No. 2011-CC-0055·Published

Opinion

In re A.L. Greathouse; Brown, Tommy G.; Dallas States; PPG Industries Inc.; Union Pacific Corp. et al.; Union Pacific Railroad Corp.; W.J. Peard; —Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 2003-001100, 2003-001101, 2003-001102, 2003-001106, 2003-001107; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01179;

Denied. Given the current procedural posture of the case, we decline to exercise our supervisory jurisdiction at this time. Defendants will have an adequate opportunity to re-urge their exception at a later stage of the proceeding, or on appeal in the event of an adverse judgment.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re A.L. Greathouse; Brown, Tommy G.; Dallas States; PPG Industries Inc.; Union Pacific Corp. et al.; Union Pacific Railroad Corp.; W.J. Peard; —Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 2003-001100, 2003-001101, 2003-001102, 2003-001106, 2003-001107; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01179;

Denied. Given the current procedural posture of the case, we decline to exercise our supervisory jurisdiction at this time. Defendants will have an adequate opportunity to re-urge their exception at a later stage of the proceeding, or on appeal in the event of an adverse judgment.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ., would grant.

Ned v. Union Pacific Corp., 61 So. 3d 664, 2011 La. LEXIS 741, 2011 WL 1619772 (La. 2011).

Pincite

61 So. 3d 664 (Ned v. Union Pacific Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.