Ned v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ned v. State

550 So. 2d 495, 1989 WL 117145

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 6, 1989

DocketNo. 88-867

StatusPublished

This text of 550 So. 2d 495 (Ned v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ned v. State, 550 So. 2d 495, 1989 WL 117145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Williams appeals from judgment and sentence following his conviction of the sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell, contending that punishment for both crimes, arising out of a single transaction involving the same controlled substance, violated double jeopardy principles. Although arguments made by appellant in support of his position were recently rejected by this court in Wheeler v. State, 549 [496]*496So.2d 687 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the rationale expressed in that opinion and the result reached nevertheless require reversal and resentencing herein. See also, Jones v. State, 551 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Further, the state’s argument that section 775.021(4) should be applied retroactively so as to govern this case was rejected by the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989).

Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND with instructions to vacate one or the other of Williams’ convictions and for resentencing.

SMITH, NIMMONS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Williams appeals from judgment and sentence following his conviction of the sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell, contending that punishment for both crimes, arising out of a single transaction involving the same controlled substance, violated double jeopardy principles. Although arguments made by appellant in support of his position were recently rejected by this court in Wheeler v. State, 549 [496]*496So.2d 687 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the rationale expressed in that opinion and the result reached nevertheless require reversal and resentencing herein. See also, Jones v. State, 551 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Further, the state’s argument that section 775.021(4) should be applied retroactively so as to govern this case was rejected by the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989).

Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND with instructions to vacate one or the other of Williams’ convictions and for resentencing.

SMITH, NIMMONS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

550 So. 2d 495, 1989 WL 117145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ned-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack