Ned v. State

550 So. 2d 495, 1989 WL 117145
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1989·No. No. 88-867·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Williams appeals from judgment and sentence following his conviction of the sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell, contending that punishment for both crimes, arising out of a single transaction involving the same controlled substance, violated double jeopardy principles. Although arguments made by appellant in support of his position were recently rejected by this court in Wheeler v. State, 549 [496]*496So.2d 687 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the rationale expressed in that opinion and the result reached nevertheless require reversal and resentencing herein. See also, Jones v. State, 551 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Further, the state’s argument that section 775.021(4) should be applied retroactively so as to govern this case was rejected by the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989).

Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND with instructions to vacate one or the other of Williams’ convictions and for resentencing.

SMITH, NIMMONS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ned v. State, 550 So. 2d 495, 1989 WL 117145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 495 (Ned v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheeler v. State
549 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Smith
547 So. 2d 613 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Jones v. State
551 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)