NECA-IBEW Local 364 Defined Contribution Pension Trust Fund v. Porter Brothers Construction, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedJanuary 3, 2025
Docket3:24-cv-50312
StatusUnknown

This text of NECA-IBEW Local 364 Defined Contribution Pension Trust Fund v. Porter Brothers Construction, Inc. (NECA-IBEW Local 364 Defined Contribution Pension Trust Fund v. Porter Brothers Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NECA-IBEW Local 364 Defined Contribution Pension Trust Fund v. Porter Brothers Construction, Inc., (N.D. Ill. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

NECA-IBEW LOCAL 364 DEFINED ) CONTRIBUTION PENSION TRUST FUND, et al.,) ) CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, ) ) NO. 24-cv-50312 vs. ) ) JUDGE IAIN D. JOHNSTON PORTER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., ) MAGISTRATE MARGARET J. an Illinois corporation, f/k/a PORTER BROTHERS ) SCHNEIDER ASPHALT & SEALING, INC., ) ) Defendant. )

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, default having been entered against the Defendant on September 23, 2024, request this Court enter judgment against Defendant, PORTER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Illinois corporation, f/k/a PORTER BROTHERS ASPHALT & SEALING, INC., pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 55(b). In support of this Motion, Plaintiffs state: 1. On September 23, 2024, this Court entered default against Defendant (Docket # 12). On November 8, 2023, this Court granted Plaintiffs= request for an order directing Defendant to turn over its monthly fringe benefit contribution reports for the time period September 2023 forward (Docket # 14). 2. Defendant’s breach of its obligations in this case are established by the allegations of the complaint and the affidavit of James Schreiber which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 3. The Court has federal question subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s complaint, as it alleges a claim under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§1132, 1145 (Docket # 1, ¶ 1). 4. The general rule is that the factual allegations of a complaint are “deemed admitted by the defendant upon default.” Davis v. Hutchins, 321 F.3d 641, 648-49 (7th Cir. 2003); F.R.C.P. 8(d). 5. Under ERISA: Every employer who is obligated to make contributions to a multiemployer plan under the terms of the plan or under the terms of a collectively bargained agreement shall, to the extent not inconsistent with law, make such contributions in accordance with the terms and conditions of such plan or such agreement.

29 U.S.C. §1145. 6. ERISA further authorizes the fiduciaries of a covered Fund to bring a civil action against employers to enforce the terms of its governing Plan or to enforce ERISA. 29 U.S.C. §1132(a)(3); Board of Trustees of the Hotel & Restaurant Emples. Local 25 v. JPR, Inc., 136 F.3d 794 (D.C. Cir. 1998). 7. Defendant submitted monthly contribution reports to the Plaintiffs identifying employees of the Defendant who performed work covered by the collective bargaining agreement, and the number of hours worked by or paid to those employees for the months of September 2023 through December 2023. Said monthly contribution reports establish that Defendant owes the Plaintiffs the amount of $113,125.28 for contributions (See, Ex.1, Schreiber Aff., ¶ 6). 8. Pursuant to the Trust Agreements, a liquidated damages surcharge has been assessed against the Defendant on all contributions due and unpaid and all contributions which were paid late, for the months of September 2023 through December 2023, in the total amount of $21,207.34 (Ex. 1, Schreiber Aff. ¶ 5, 7-8).

2 9. Plaintiffs’ firm has expended $549.00 for costs and $1,332.50 for attorneys’ fees in this matter. (See, Ex. 2, Affidavit of Catherine M. Chapman, ¶ 10). 10. Based upon the documents attached hereto, Plaintiffs request entry of judgment by default in the total amount of $136,214.12. A draft proposed judgment order will be submitted via the Court’s proposed email box.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter judgment in the amount of $136,214.12.

/s/ Patrick N. Ryan

Patrick N. Ryan Attorney for Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 1825 Chicago, IL 60606-5250 Bar No.: 6278364 Telephone: (312) 216-2573 Facsimile: (312) 236-0241 E-Mail: pryan@baumsigman.com

I:\364J\PORTER BROTHERS\MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.PNR.DF.DOCX 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that he electronically filed the foregoing document (Motion for Entry of Judgment) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following non-CM/ECF participants on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 3rd day of January 2025:

Mr. Trent L. Bush, Registered Agent Porter Brothers Construction, Inc., f/k/a Porter Brothers Asphalt & Sealing, Inc. 202 East Fifth Street Sterling, IL 61081-3651

Mr. Matthew Porter, President Porter Brothers Construction, Inc. 9904 Freeport Road Rock Falls, IL 61071-9502

Patrick N. Ryan Attorney for Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 1825 Chicago, IL 60606-5250 Bar No.: 6278364 Telephone: (312) 216-2573 Facsimile: (312) 236-0241 E-Mail: pryan@baumsigman.com

I:\364J\PORTER BROTHERS\MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.PNR.DF.DOCX

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
NECA-IBEW Local 364 Defined Contribution Pension Trust Fund v. Porter Brothers Construction, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neca-ibew-local-364-defined-contribution-pension-trust-fund-v-porter-ilnd-2025.