Nebraska Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Roach

Nebraska Supreme Court

Nebraska Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Roach

213 N.W. 587, 115 Neb. 412, 1927 Neb. LEXIS 56

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedApril 12, 1927

DocketNo. 24734

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 N.W. 587 (Nebraska Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Roach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nebraska Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Roach, 213 N.W. 587, 115 Neb. 412, 1927 Neb. LEXIS 56 (Neb. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Rose, J.

This is an action by the Nebraska Wheat Growers Association, plaintiff, to require John Roach, as a member thereof, defendant, to perform a cooperative marketing contract obligating him to sell and deliver to plaintiff the wheat raised by him during the years 1921 to 1925, inclusive, grain for feed and seed excepted. The action was' dismissed and plaintiff appealed.

There was no error in the nonsuit. The marketing contract pleaded by plaintiff, to become effective, required notice to defendant that his application for membership in the association had been accepted. The necessary notice was neither pleaded nor proved. It follows that the pleadings and proof do not show that defendant was bound by the contract which plaintiff sought to enforce. Idaho Grimm Alfalfa Seed Growers Ass’n v. Stroschein, 42 Idaho, 12.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose, J.

This is an action by the Nebraska Wheat Growers Association, plaintiff, to require John Roach, as a member thereof, defendant, to perform a cooperative marketing contract obligating him to sell and deliver to plaintiff the wheat raised by him during the years 1921 to 1925, inclusive, grain for feed and seed excepted. The action was' dismissed and plaintiff appealed.

There was no error in the nonsuit. The marketing contract pleaded by plaintiff, to become effective, required notice to defendant that his application for membership in the association had been accepted. The necessary notice was neither pleaded nor proved. It follows that the pleadings and proof do not show that defendant was bound by the contract which plaintiff sought to enforce. Idaho Grimm Alfalfa Seed Growers Ass’n v. Stroschein, 42 Idaho, 12.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 N.W. 587, 115 Neb. 412, 1927 Neb. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nebraska-wheat-growers-assn-v-roach-neb-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack