Nebraska Public Power District v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nebraska Public Power District v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 590 F.3d 1357 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 15, 2010·No. 07-5083e·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

January 15, 2010

ERRATA

2007-5083 Nebraska Public Power

Decided: January 12, 2010 Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes to Judge Gajarsa’s dissent:

On page 7, line 14, replace “their” with – its -- so that the sentence reads “Notwithstanding its cleverly worded....”

On page 12, line 22, replace “affects” with -- effects --.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

January 15, 2010

ERRATA

2007-5083 Nebraska Public Power

Decided: January 12, 2010 Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes to Judge Gajarsa’s dissent:

On page 7, line 14, replace “their” with – its -- so that the sentence reads “Notwithstanding its cleverly worded....”

On page 12, line 22, replace “affects” with -- effects --.

Nebraska Public Power District v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Nebraska Public Power District v. United States (Nebraska Public Power District v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.