Nebraska ex rel. Bittenbender v. Excise Board

244 U.S. 645, 37 S. Ct. 651, 61 L. Ed. 1368, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1677
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 21, 1917·No. No. 250·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487; Stearns v. Wood, 236 U. S. 75.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nebraska ex rel. Bittenbender v. Excise Board, 244 U.S. 645, 37 S. Ct. 651, 61 L. Ed. 1368, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1677 (1917).

244 U.S. 645 (Nebraska ex rel. Bittenbender v. Excise Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Jones v. Montague
194 U.S. 147 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Richardson v. McChesney
218 U.S. 487 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Stearns v. Wood
236 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Mellon Co. v. McCafferty
239 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1915)