Nebraska ex rel. Bittenbender v. Excise Board

244 U.S. 645, 37 S. Ct. 651, 61 L. Ed. 1368, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1677
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 21, 1917
DocketNo. 250
StatusPublished

This text of 244 U.S. 645 (Nebraska ex rel. Bittenbender v. Excise Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nebraska ex rel. Bittenbender v. Excise Board, 244 U.S. 645, 37 S. Ct. 651, 61 L. Ed. 1368, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1677 (1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487; Stearns v. Wood, 236 U. S. 75.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Jones v. Montague
194 U.S. 147 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Richardson v. McChesney
218 U.S. 487 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Stearns v. Wood
236 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Mellon Co. v. McCafferty
239 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 U.S. 645, 37 S. Ct. 651, 61 L. Ed. 1368, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nebraska-ex-rel-bittenbender-v-excise-board-scotus-1917.