Nebbitt v. State
This text of 198 S.W.3d 664 (Nebbitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Pablo Nebbitt, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that the motion court clearly erred in finding that movant was not prejudiced by his trial counsel erroneously eliciting testimony about an uncharged crime.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for *665 this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.W.3d 664, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1238, 2006 WL 2406243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nebbitt-v-state-moctapp-2006.