Nebb v. Goldstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nebb v. Goldstein

802 So. 2d 393, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16054, 2001 WL 1417871

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 2001

DocketNo. 4D01-2391

StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 393 (Nebb v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nebb v. Goldstein, 802 So. 2d 393, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16054, 2001 WL 1417871 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant in this case has faded to provide this court with the complete record from the post-seizure preliminary hearing. This court is therefore unable to determine whether probable cause was in fact demonstrated to the trial court. Hence, appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court was without probable cause to order the seizure of the video gambling machines. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

STONE, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant in this case has faded to provide this court with the complete record from the post-seizure preliminary hearing. This court is therefore unable to determine whether probable cause was in fact demonstrated to the trial court. Hence, appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court was without probable cause to order the seizure of the video gambling machines. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

STONE, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 So. 2d 393, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16054, 2001 WL 1417871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nebb-v-goldstein-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack