Neathway v. FitzGerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neathway v. FitzGerald

112 A.D.3d 497, 977 N.Y.S.2d 664

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 2013·Published

Opinion

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said [498]*498proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said [498]*498proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Neathway v. FitzGerald, 112 A.D.3d 497, 977 N.Y.S.2d 664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

112 A.D.3d 497 (Neathway v. FitzGerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.