Nease v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
126 A.D. 923
Opinion
—Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented on the authority of Berkery v. Brie B. B. Oo. (55 App. Div. 489; affd., 173 N. Y. 636).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nease v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 126 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
126 A.D. 923 (Nease v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dimon v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
66 N.E. 628 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Berkery v. Erie Railroad
55 A.D. 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)