Nease v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

126 A.D. 923

Opinion

—Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented on the authority of Berkery v. Brie B. B. Oo. (55 App. Div. 489; affd., 173 N. Y. 636).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nease v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 126 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

126 A.D. 923 (Nease v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dimon v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
66 N.E. 628 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Berkery v. Erie Railroad
55 A.D. 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)