Neary v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Neary v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

69 Pa. Super. 562, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 134

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 10, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 111·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Head, J.,

The single question involved in this appeal is clearly stated in the opinion filed by the learned court below. Its answer depends on a proper interpretation of Paragraph E, Section 306, of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. We are convinced the learned court below reached the correct conclusion and the opinion filed by him furnishes reasons satisfactory to us in support of that conclusion. We therefore overrule the assignments of error and dismiss the appeal at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Head, J.,

The single question involved in this appeal is clearly stated in the opinion filed by the learned court below. Its answer depends on a proper interpretation of Paragraph E, Section 306, of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. We are convinced the learned court below reached the correct conclusion and the opinion filed by him furnishes reasons satisfactory to us in support of that conclusion. We therefore overrule the assignments of error and dismiss the appeal at the costs of the appellant.

Neary v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 69 Pa. Super. 562, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 134 (Pa. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

69 Pa. Super. 562 (Neary v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related