Neary v. O'Connor
This text of 260 A.D. 986 (Neary v. O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur. (The order of Monroe Special Term of Supreme Court dismisses the petition in a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, seeking reinstatement of petitioner to the office of judge’s clerk of the Criminal Branch of the Rochester City Court.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 986, 24 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neary-v-oconnor-nyappdiv-1940.