Neary v. Cahill
This text of 20 Ill. 214 (Neary v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a trial of the right of property, under our statute. The property belonged to the defendant in the execution and four others, as tenants in common, and the entire property in the mare was levied upon as belonging to the defendant in execution exclusively; and we think the court properly held that the claimants, who were the other tenants in common, had a right to recover on this trial. Had the levy been upon the interest alope of John Duffy, which was one-fifth, the other tenants in common would have had no cause to complain, and it may be, even, that the constable might have taken exclusive possession of the property for the purpose of selling that interest; but he had no right to levy upon and sell the entire right or title to the property; and his attempt to do so made his act wrongful, and the claimants were properly allowed to recover.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Ill. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neary-v-cahill-ill-1858.