Neare v. James
3 Thomp. & Cook 786
This text of 3 Thomp. & Cook 786 (Neare v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neare v. James, 3 Thomp. & Cook 786 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).
Opinion
E. Darwin Smith, J.
The opinion reviews the facts and holds that the judgment should, be affirmed upon the grounds stated in the head-note. It is not believed necessary to give the opinion at length.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Thomp. & Cook 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neare-v-james-nysupct-1874.