Near v. Van Alstyne

14 Wend. 230
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 14 Wend. 230 (Near v. Van Alstyne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Near v. Van Alstyne, 14 Wend. 230 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1835).

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

By the construction given by this court, in Brace v. Benson, 10 Wendell, 214, to the revised statutes, 2 R. S. 424, 5, and 225, it was held that justices have the power of amendment, in the same manner as courts of record before judgment. The amendment made by the justice was clearly such an one as it became his right and duty to make. The provision requiring process to be filled up before issuing, 2 R. S. 267, § 233, was intended to guard against the abuse which at one time was but too common. Justices put blank process into the hands of constables and others, to be filled up by them as they saw fit, in the same manner as attornies in courts of record issue process. To such cases the statute is applicable, but does not interfere with [231]*231the power of amendment in clerical mistakes, in process issued properly by the justice himself.

The common pleas erred, and the judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kidd v. Dougherty
26 N.W. 510 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
Talcott v. Rosenberg
8 Abb. Pr. 287 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1870)
Bacon v. Bassett
19 Wis. 45 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1865)
Farrand v. Bentley
6 Mich. 281 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Wend. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/near-v-van-alstyne-nysupct-1835.