Neale v. Hill
This text of 1 D.C. 3 (Neale v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
considering the following note as “ a note for the security of money,” refused to suffer it to go in evidence to the jury, because it was not stamped according to the Act of 6th July, 1797, § 1 and 13. [1 Stat. at Large, 527.]
The note was in these words, viz.: “ Alexandria, December 15, 1798. Received of Mr. Thomas Carberry six hundred and fifty cart white-oak hhd. staves, at the rate of twenty dollars per thousand, and eighteen hundred barrel staves, at ten dollars per thousand, the which I promise to pay the said Thomas Car-berry, or order, in all the month of April'hext ensuing. Witness my hand, day and date above written. George Hill.”
Indorsed, “ December 15th, 1798. Pay the "within to Joseph Neale or order, and his receipt shall be good against
“Thomas Carberry.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 D.C. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neale-v-hill-dcd-1801.