Neale v. Engle

7 A. 60, 4 Sadler 1
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 1, 1886·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The court below properly determined that the questions arising in this case during the trial were questions of fact, hence, property referable to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neale v. Engle, 7 A. 60, 4 Sadler 1 (Pa. 1886).

7 A. 60 (Neale v. Engle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blake v. Hunsberger
46 Pa. Super. 32 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Fravell v. Nett
48 N.W. 446 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1891)
Hill v. Hill
23 N.E. 87 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)